Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Biomed Mater Eng ; 35(1): 27-37, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37482973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), which artificially creates a portocaval shunt to reduce portal venous pressure, has gradually become the primary treatment for portal hypertension (PH). However, there is no prefect shunting scheme in TIPS to balance the occurrence of postoperative complications and effective haemostasis. OBJECTIVE: To construct cirrhotic PH models and compare different shunting schemes in TIPS. METHODS: Three cases of cirrhotic PH with different liver volumes were selected for enhanced computed tomography scanning. The models for different shunting schemes were created using Mimics software, and following FLUENT calculation, all the models were imported into the software computational fluid dynamic-post for processing. In each shunting scheme, the differences in portal vein pressure, hepatic blood perfusion and blood flow from the superior mesenteric vein in the shunt tract were compared. The coefficient G was adapted to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages. RESULTS: (1) Concerning the precise location of the shunt tract, the wider the diameter of the shunt tract, the lower the pressure of the portal vein and the lesser the hepatic blood perfusion. Meanwhile, the pressure drop objective was not achieved with the 6 mm-diameter shunting scheme. (2) The 8 mm-diameter shunting scheme through the left portal vein (LPV) had the highest coefficient G. CONCLUSION: The 8 mm-diameter shunting scheme through the LPV may demonstrate a superior effect and prognosis in TIPS procedures.


Assuntos
Hipertensão Portal , Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática , Humanos , Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática/efeitos adversos , Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática/métodos , Veia Porta/cirurgia , Hipertensão Portal/cirurgia , Hipertensão Portal/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/cirurgia , Hemodinâmica , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 98: 398-405, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37858667

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sharp recanalization is a viable procedure for some refractory central venous occlusions that cannot be recanalized with the conventional technique. The sharp recanalization procedures reported in previous studies are often rely on costly devices and with a certain proportion of complications. This study aimed to present an inexpensive and risk-controllable coaxial centrifugally sharp recanalization technique that was independent of any additional costly devices. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 8 patients who had received sharp recanalization of central venous occlusions, between August 2017 and May 2021. The sharp recanalization technique was performed centrifugally with the stiff end of a microguidewire after the lesions failed to be passed through with the conventional technique. Clinical data of patients on their lesions, technical success rate, procedure-related complications, and patency rates were collected and analyzed to assess the efficacy and safety of the technique. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all patients, with no complications were observed. All symptoms were ameliorated within 48h postsurgery. The median follow-up period was 22 months. All patients maintained patency or assisted patency at 12 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Sharp recanalization performed centrifugally with the stiff end of the microguidewire could be a cost-effective and safe alternative procedure for the treatment of refractory central venous occlusion that cannot be recanalized with conventional technique.


Assuntos
Diálise Renal , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
3.
J Vasc Access ; : 11297298221134142, 2022 Nov 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36324210

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness of stent graft (SG) for the treatment of central venous disease (CVD) in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Between January 2014 and April 2022, 122 patients on hemodialysis with symptomatic CVD were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bare-metal stent (BMS) or SG placement. The mean follow-up was 14.5 months (IQR: 8.0, 24.2). Patency rates of the target sites were calculated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank studies. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between various characteristics and target site primary patency. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 100%. At 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, the target sites primary patency rates were 86.4%, 74.2%, 45.1%, and 30.4% for PTA; 94.7%, 78.6%, 60.8%, and 45.6% for BMS; and 94.0%, 92.0%, 82.4%, and 66.8% for SG, respectively, and the assisted primary patency rates were 86.5%, 80.4%, 63.8%, and 46.0% for PTA; 94.7%, 89.5%, 77.5%, and 71.1% for BMS; 100%, 100%, 97.8%, and 83.4% for SG, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that SGs achieved better primary and assisted primary patency than PTA or BMS (p<0.05). SG use and concomitant stenosis were the independent predictors of target site primary patency dysfunction in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the better long-term patency of SG in comparison with PTA and BMS for the treatment of CVD in hemodialysis patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...